What is the exception affecting the setting of addition-silicone impression materials?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Enhance your skills for the Fellow of the Academy of General Dentistry Exam. Study with comprehensive multiple-choice questions and detailed explanations. Get fully prepared for your exam today!

The correct response highlights the impact of using antimicrobial mouthwash prior to treatment as a factor that does not affect the setting of addition-silicone impression materials. While it is essential to understand the significance of proper impression material handling, the other choices present scenarios that directly interfere with the polymerization and setting process of addition-silicone materials.

For instance, the presence of sulfur from latex gloves can inhibit the setting reaction of addition silicone because sulfurous compounds in the impression materials can react adversely with the platinum catalyst. Similarly, platinum-containing catalysts can be poisoned by various substances, which would hinder the material’s ability to set properly. Lastly, residual monomer from acrylic temporary restorations can also negatively affect the setting process by introducing contaminants that interfere with the chemical reaction necessary for proper hardening.

Using an antimicrobial mouthwash, however, does not exert the same detrimental effects on the setting of addition-silicone impression materials as the other choices do. While it may alter the oral environment, it does not introduce sulfur or other incompatible substances that would interfere with the curing process. Understanding these interactions is crucial for making informed decisions regarding impression-taking protocols in dental practices.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy